Legal Opinion
Richards of Rockford, Inc. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 21, 1976No. C-74-0578-CBRPublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
RENFREW, District Judge.
Plaintiff Richards of Rockford, Inc. (“Richards”) brought this diversity action against defendant Pacific Gas and Electric Company (“PG&E”). In the course of discovery, plaintiff moved to compel a third party to testify and to produce documents concerning certain confidential interviews with employees of PG&E. The issues having been briefed and argued, the Court denied the motion from the bench. While this case was subsequently settled on the *389eve of trial, the Court felt a written discussion of the reasons for its order would be appropriate because…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Blackmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Charles Baker v. F & F InvestmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Judy Garland v. Marie TorreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Apicella v. McNeil Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1975
3Cited by32 opinions
- Truswal Systems Corp. v. Hydro-Air Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Richard A. Farnsworth v. The Procter & Gamble Company v. Center for Disease Control, Movant/appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- The Dow Chemical Company, Intervening v. Dr. James R. Allen and John Van Miller, and James P. Wachtendonk, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- W. Simon Katz v. Batavia Marine & Sporting Supplies, Inc., and Def-Tec Corporation, Movant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Kansas Medical Mutual Insurance v. SvatySupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.