Rogers v. Dupree
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBarnes, Presiding Judge
Because the trial court erred in denying Butters and Cohen’s motions to dismiss and did not err in granting Dupree’s motion to dismiss, I respectfully dissent in part from the majority opinion.5 Rogers’ claims against all three lawyers should be dismissed under the Georgia Anti-Strategic Litigation against Public Participation Statute (Anti-SLAPP Statute), OCGA § 9-11-11.1. Additionally, because Rogers seeks damages solely for the conduct of counsel undertaken to pursue litigation on their client’s behalf, Rogers’ claims should be dismissed under the exclusive remedy provision of the abusive…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Murphy v. BajjaniSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Kearney v. Foley & Lardner, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Anthony v. American General Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Rolleston v. HuiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.