Legal Opinion
Kearney v. Foley & Lardner, LLP
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 12, 2009No. 07-55566PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING THE PETITION FOR REHEARING AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The opinion filed on May 12, 2009, and amended September 18, 2009, is further amended as follows: Slip opinion at page 13572, paragraph 2, line 10, delete “are” and replace it with “may be.” On line 10 delete the sentence “The California Penal Code ... keep it from being produced.”
With these changes, Appellant’s petition for rehearing is DENIED.
OPINION
EZRA, District Judge:
Joan Kearney (“Kearney”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of the federal and state law claims she filed against a representative of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Mosdos Chofetz Chaim, Inc. v. Village of Wesley HillsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Committee to Protect our Agricultural Water v. Occidental Oil & Gas Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Rupert v. BondDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Cline v. Reetz-LaioloDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Freeman v. ABC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.