Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Standart

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1860PublishedCited by 32 opinions

APPEAL from the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWokden, J.

Suit by Standart and others as indorsees, against a part of the appellants as makers, and against the others as indorsers, of a promissory note, set out as follows, viz:

“ $2,000. Indianapolis, March, 23, 1858.

Two months after date we promise to pay to the order of M. Wolf \ at the Mercantile BanTc, N. Y., two thousand dollars, value received, without any relief whatever from valuation or appraisement laws.

(Signed,) Hunt & Andersons.

(Indorsed,) M. Wolf. John F. Hill?

Pleadings were filed, issues formed, and the cause tried by the Court; resulting in a finding and judgment for the plaintiffs…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Allen v. Merchant's BankCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
  2. Lessee of Levy v. McCarteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. Aymar v. SheldonNew York Supreme Court · 1834
  4. Shanklin v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  5. Dundas v. BowlerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1844

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Alford v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. City of Aurora v. WestIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Fourth National Bank of Montgomery v. BraggSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  4. Gray v. State Ex Rel. Coghlen, 9131Indiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Maddox v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API