Legal Opinion

Stockwell v. McAlvay

California Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1937No. L. A. No. 14793PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE, J., pro tem.

Defendants have appealed from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs setting aside a sheriff’s sale of shares of Consumers Salt Company.

Plaintiffs V. E. Stockwell and B. C. Stockwell are husband and wife. Defendants Irwin and Rose are attorneys for defendant McAlvay. On June 18, 1925, McAlvay obtained a judgment, hereinafter referred to as the fraud judgment, against V. E. Stockwell in the sum of $16,000 based upon the fraud of the latter in the sale of real estate to Mc-Alvay. Prior to the entry of this judgment, but subsequent to the accrual of the cause of action therein and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Jacksboro v. LasaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. In re FrazinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  4. United Bank & Trust Co. v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Cowell v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Winter v. McMillanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Hunter v. EasthamTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Alcorn v. BuschkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Randall v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Palmer v. Texas Tram & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API