Legal Opinion

Groves v. Ring Screw Works

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 16, 1989No. Nos. 88-1452, 88-1579PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLFORD, Circuit Judge.

We are concerned with two cases, consolidated on appeal, in which the district courts dismissed employee claims under § 301 of the Labor Relations Management Act holding that the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) provided that a strike or other job action was the exclusive means of grievance resolution. The applicable CBAs provided that the parties were bound if an agreement was reached at some stage of the prescribed process. If the grievance procedure failed to resolve the grievance, the union might strike, but exhaustion of the contract procedure was required…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Groves v. Ring Screw WorksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  2. Shivers v. Saginaw Transit SystemDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1989
  3. United States v. FarradCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. Henley v. PitcherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API