Legal Opinion
Henley v. Pitcher
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 24, 2001No. 01-1311Published
1Opinion of the Court
*397Dwight Morrow Henley, II, proceeding pro se, appeals a district court judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
By way of background, the record reflects that Henley was a plaintiff in La-Coss, et al. v. Engler, et al, No. I:99cv809 (W.D.Mich. Oct. 14, 1999) (a civil rights action), and Davis v. Michigan Dep’t of Corr., No. 222478 (Mich.Ct.App. Oct.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Issac Lydell Herron v. Jimmy HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Terry Smith v. Ameritech Ameritech Publishing, Inc. Sickness and Accident Disability Benefit Plan Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.