Legal Opinion

Henning v. Industrial Welfare Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1988No. S005119PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

We granted review in this proceeding to answer a question that is urgent and of statewide importance: whether Order No. MW-88 of the Industrial Welfare Commission (hereinafter the IWC or Commission), which established, effective July 1, 1988, a so-called “two-tier” minimum wage system containing a lower, “alternative minimum wage” for certain employees who customarily receive tips, is barred by Labor Code section 351 (hereinafter section 351). As we shall explain, we conclude that the question must be answered in the affirmative.

I. The Facts

On December 18, 1987, the IWC adopted…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 103, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  2. J.R. Simplot Company, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Louie Hung Kwei Lu v. Hawaiian Gardens Casino, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Krumme v. Mercury InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. STATE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API