Mukhtar v. California State University, Hayward
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
319 F.3d 1073
Mohamed Osman Elsayed MUKHTAR, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, HAYWARD, a public entity, Carlos Navarro and Norma Rees, employees of the California State University in their Official and Individual Capacities, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 01-15565.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted April 11, 2002.
Filed August 7, 2002.
Amended February 12, 2003.
Fania E. Davis, Oakland, CA, argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellee and filed a brief; Darryl Parker, Seattle, WA, was on the brief.
Felicia R. Reid, Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly &…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Catharina F. Costa v. Desert Palace, Inc., Dba Caesars Palace Hotel & CasinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Goebel v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Sharon Ann RahmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Elsayed Mukhtar v. California State University, HaywardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. NacchioCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Anthony GadsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Kristi W. Dorn, Personal Representative Est Larry M. Dorn v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Patrick BaconCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- In Re Remec Incorporated Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.