United States v. Alonzo L. Plakio, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Alonzo Plakio, Jr. pled guilty to being a felon-in-possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).1 Pursuant to USSG § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A),2 the district court calculated Plakio’s base offense level as 20 based on a prior state felony drug conviction. Plakio objected, claiming his prior drug conviction did…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Johnny Craig HarpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- State v. GouldSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- United States v. Daryl Lamar JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. HoyleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. WattreeDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.