Legal Opinion
United States v. Hill
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 22, 2008No. 07-3034PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PANEL REHEARING
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
This matter is before the court on the government’s Petition for Rehearing En Banc. Although we deny the government’s motion for rehearing en banc, we grant panel rehearing based on superseding Supreme Court precedent. The panel’s Jan uary 15, 2008 opinion, United States v. Hill, 512 F.3d 1277, 2008 WL 134207 (10th Cir.2008), is vacated and replaced with the opinion issued herewith. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot, without prejudice to the filing of a petition for rehearing from the panel’s revised opinion. We suspend…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Cunningham v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Martinez-TorresCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. HollisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- STATE, EX REL. HORNE v. CamposCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.