Legal Opinion

United States v. Hill

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 15, 2008No. 07-3034PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

Jay T. Hill pleaded guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) for being a felon in possession of a firearm. As a condition of his plea agreement, Hill reserved the right to appeal whether his underlying Kansas conviction for criminal possession of a firearm was a qualifying felony conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Hill argued because his Kansas conviction carried a maximum sentence of eleven months, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) does not prohibit him from possessing a firearm. Exercising ju risdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court reverses and remands to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Cunningham v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. WattreeDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API