Legal Opinion
Amar v. Garnier Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided November 10, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 66-340PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
WILLIAM P. GRAY, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a resident of Idaho, seeks to bring this shareholder’s derivative action against a California corporation and its officers, all of whom are residents of California. The defendants successfully moved to dismiss the action on the basis of the original complaint. They now similarly attack the second amended complaint and also have moved for summary judgment.
The Background, Facts. The pertinent, facts, as determined from the complaint, the records of the California state courts, the deposition of the plaintiff, and several…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- T. O. Bradbury and N. B. Burt v. Frank DennisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Williams v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1953
- McDonald v. SmalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1828
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dudley Warren Schilling, Cross v. J. A. Belcher, Sr., Cross Dudley Warren Schilling v. J. A. Belcher, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Caribbean Mills, Inc. v. Clayton S. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Ferrara v. Philadelphia Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 1967
- Walden v. ElrodDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1976
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.