T. O. Bradbury and N. B. Burt v. Frank Dennis
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Chief Judge.
This interlocutory appeal under Section 1292(b) Title 28 U.S.C., squarely presents the question of the trial court’s diversity jurisdiction. It is contended that the assignment of the asserted cause of action by a wholly owned resident corporation to its nonresident stockholder-plaintiff was “improperly or collusively” made to invoke federal court jurisdiction within the meaning of Section 1359, 28 U.S.C., which denies diversity jurisdiction in such cases. 1 The trial court sustained its diversity jurisdiction, but certified the question here as one as to which “there is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Lehigh Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Sowell v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Miller & Lux, Inc. v. East Side Canal & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- William H. Hendrix v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Basso v. Utah Power And Light CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Prudential Oil Corporation v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Airlines Reporting Corp. v. S & N Travel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.