Legal Opinion
Williams v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 5, 1953No. Civ. No. 14186PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHES, District Judge.
By this action plaintiffs seek recovery of damages for alleged wrongful deaths claimed to have resulted proximately from the asserted negligence of defendants. Jurisdiction of this -court as to claims against defendants Midland Rubber Corporation and Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company is invoked upon the basis of diversity of citizenship. 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
It is alleged in the amended complaint that the deaths occurred in a synthetic-rubber manufacturing plant located at Torrance, California; that “defendant Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company and defendant…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- John Welsh and Flo-Start, Inc. v. James W. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Anand Prakash v. American UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- O'Hare International Bank, a National Banking Association v. Berlon E. HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Gerard A. Harrison and Harrison Ranch, Inc. v. Carey Prather and William PratherCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Simon Zunamon v. W. G. Brown, J. P. Brown, Sr., and J. E. (Doc) BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.