Legal Opinion
United States v. International Business Machines Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 7, 1975No. 69 Civ. 200 (DNE)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDELSTEIN, Chief Judge:
The plaintiff United States has moved for leave to amend its complaint, filed January 17, 1969, in this civil antitrust action. The gravamen of the original complaint is that defendant International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”) “has attempted to monopolize and has monopolized . . . interstate trade and commerce in general purpose digital computers in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. § 2).” The complaint alleges that the charged offenses “are continuing and will continue unless the relief hereinafter prayed for is granted.”
Paragraph 20…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Frank Howey v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. Radio Corporation of America, Third-Party v. Universal Services, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States v. HoughamSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Sharon Hageman, Admx. Of the Estate of Donald Hageman v. Signal L. P. Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Middle Atlantic Utilities Co. v. S. M. W. Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Caruso v. Local Union No. 690Washington Supreme Court · 1983
- Duling v. Gristede's Operating Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Electronics Warehouse, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1988
- Eagle River Mobile Home Park, Ltd. v. District Court Ex Rel. County of EagleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- ESI Montgomery County, Inc. v. Montenay International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.