Legal Opinion
Farmilant v. Singapore Airlines, Ltd.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 15, 1983No. 82 C 1270PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Eugene Farmilant (“Farmilant”) sues Singapore Airlines, Ltd. (“Airline”), alleging fraudulent misrepresentation, “tortious breach of contract,” negligence and willful and wanton conduct in connection with Airline’s failure to furnish him passage on flights from Singapore to Madras, India and from Madras back to the United States. Airline has moved for summary judgment. For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order:
1. Airline’s motion is denied.
2. This Court finds (a) certain “material facts exist without substantial controversy”…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mary Elizabeth Foy Donnelly v. H. Gibson GuionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Leonard Thornton and William Carothers, Etc. v. James E. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Frances Louise Ross v. Inter-Ocean Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bratton v. Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Jackson & TuckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Lichter v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Bellock v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Vickers v. FreyerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
- Chaganti v. 12 Phone International, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2007