Legal Opinion

Lichter v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 29, 1983No. 83 C 2834PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

David Lichter (“Lichter”) sues Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. (“Paine Webber”) for having failed to notify Lichter of the need to deposit funds in his securities account before Paine Webber liquidated International Harvester bonds to maintain Lichter’s requisite margin requirements. Lichter’s Complaint advances four claims stemming from that failure to give him advance notice:

1. Count I charges negligence (and perhaps breach of an implied contractual duty).

2. Count II asserts breach of a fiduciary duty.

3. Count III claims a violation…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Grafon Corporation v. Elmer P. Hausermann and Marten C. HausermannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,220 Mathers Fund, Inc. v. The Colwell CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  5. Frances Louise Ross v. Inter-Ocean Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Salazar v. Furr's, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1986
  2. Racich v. Mid Continent Builders Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  3. Bellock v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  4. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Unlimited Automotive, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  5. Loper v. Advest, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API