Legal Opinion

Chaganti v. 12 Phone International, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 23, 2007No. C 04-987 VRWPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

VAUGHN R. WALKER, United States District Chief Judge.

Naren Chaganti, an attorney representing himself, claims that 12 Phone International, Inc (12 Phone) and its president, Paul Arena, unlawfully interfered with Chaganti’s attorney-client relationship with Supercaller Community, Inc (Super-caller). Chaganti also alleges breach of contract against 12 Phone in its capacity as Supercaller’s successor-in-interest. 12 Phone and Arena move to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, alternatively, for summary judgment. Doc. # 77. Chaganti also moves for summary judgment. Doc. # 75.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Richard Augustine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cruz v. CruzDistrict Court, D. Guam · 2024
  2. Ridgway v. PhillipsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  3. Smith v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
  4. Tametria Nash-Perry v. JTH Tax Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API