Legal Opinion
Philipp Bros., Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided December 6, 1960No. C.D. 2222PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ItiCHARDSON, Judge:
This suit presents for determination the question of the proper classification of eight importations of certain tan-*191talite-coliunbite slags described in the invoices as “scories tantaliferes, quality A” and “scories tantaliferes, quality B.”
The collector of customs classified the merchandise as waste, not specially provided for, and assessed duty at the rate of 4 per centum ad valorem under 19 U.S.C.A., section 1001, paragraph 1555 (paragraph 1555, Tariff Act of 1930), as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739). The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- American Smelting & Refining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Bemis Bro. Bag v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
- O. G. Hempstead & Son v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
- Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Philipp Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Philipp Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Union Carbide Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Englehardt Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969