Legal Opinion
Cobb v. Clark
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided April 2, 1969No. 6915SC20PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBritt, J.
The first question presented by this appeal is whether the superior court. should have sustained defendants’ plea of the statute of limitations. The action is clearly barred by subsection 5 of G.S. 1-52 unless saved by the operation of G.S. 1-25 which provides as follows:
“§ 1-25. New action within one year after nonsuit, etc. — If an action is commenced within the time prescribed therefor, and the plaintiff is nonsuited, or a judgment therein reversed on appeal, or is arrested, the plaintiff or, if he dies and the cause of action survives, his heir or representative may commence a new action…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- High v. BroadnaxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Halcombe v. Commissioners of HaywoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Jones v. MathisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Marshall Motor Co. v. Universal Credit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Cobb v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Haislip v. RiggsDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1981
- Bockweg v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Porter v. GroatDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1989
- H. McBride Realty, Inc. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.