Legal Opinion

Bockweg v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 4, 1990No. 8921SC247PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Judge.

Plaintiffs contend that the statute of limitations (G.S. 145(c)) was tolled by the one-year savings provision of G.S. 1A-1, Rule 41. The relevant language of Rule 41(a)(1) provides:

If an action commenced within the time prescribed ... is dismissed without prejudice under this subsection, a new action based on the same claim may be commenced within one year after such dismissal unless [the judge shall specify in his order a shorter time].

Defendants contend that the one-year savings provision does not apply since the original suit was brought in a Federal Court. They rely on High…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. High v. BroadnaxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Haislip v. RiggsDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Bockweg v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API