Bockweg v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Judge.
Plaintiffs contend that the statute of limitations (G.S. 145(c)) was tolled by the one-year savings provision of G.S. 1A-1, Rule 41. The relevant language of Rule 41(a)(1) provides:
If an action commenced within the time prescribed ... is dismissed without prejudice under this subsection, a new action based on the same claim may be commenced within one year after such dismissal unless [the judge shall specify in his order a shorter time].
Defendants contend that the one-year savings provision does not apply since the original suit was brought in a Federal Court. They rely on High…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- High v. BroadnaxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Haislip v. RiggsDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Bockweg v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993