Legal Opinion

Halcombe v. Commissioners of Haywood

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1883PublishedCited by 13 opinions

MotxoN for an injunction in a suit pending in Haywood Superior Court, heard at Chambers, before Avery, J. From the order refusing to grant the motion, the plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The aim of the present action is to arrest the collection of county taxes levied in excess of two-thirds of one per centum upon the valuation of the taxable property in the county of Haywood.

Numerous irregularities are apparent in the conduct of the cause from its beginning to the appeal. The summons issued on December 9th, 1882, and served soon after on the commissioners, is returnable to the term of the superior court held in the month of May of the year following. The plaintiff on the same day filed in the clerk’s office a verified complaint, and five days thereafter what he designates a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roulhac v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  2. Jones v. . ThorneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Wilson v. . LinebergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  4. Mabry v. . HenrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  5. London v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Herring v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. Prevatt v. Harrelson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Moose v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Pasour v. . LinebergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  5. Burgin v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API