Legal Opinion

Marshall Motor Co. v. Universal Credit Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 26, 1941PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

This appeal presents the question whether the plaintiff, having previously submitted to a voluntary nonsuit in the U. S. District Court in an action wherein more than fifteen thousand dollars was claimed as penalty for usury in numerous independent transactions, has the right, thereafter, to institute in the State court four separate suits embracing the identical items set out in the original action, the sum demanded in each case being less than three thousand dollars. In other words, may the plaintiff, having submitted to nonsuit upon the cause of action originally stated, embracing many…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Friederichsen v. RenardSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Trull v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. Oldham v. . RiegerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Johnson v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. High v. BroadnaxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Service Fire Insurance v. Horton Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Elliott v. GossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Rita Shircliff and Raphael M. Shircliff v. Mary A. Elliott and Mose L. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API