Legal Opinion

Miller v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 2002No. S-9735PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Borough imposed a road improvement special assessment against each of nine lots William and Barbara Miller own in a newly formed local improvement district. The superior court rejected the Millers' administrative appeal challenging the assessment. We affirm, because we conclude that (1) the borough ordinance allocating paving special assessments to residential lots on a per-lot basis does not conflict with state law, and (2) a borough ordinance limiting special assessments to twenty-five percent of the lots' tax-appraised value does not apply to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Valley Hospital Ass'n v. Mat-Su Coalition for ChoiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Rosen v. State Board of Public AccountancyAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Cook Inlet Pipe Line Co. v. Alaska Public Utilities CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alaska Association of Naturopathic Physicians v. State, Division of Corporations, Business & Professional LicensingAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Hodari v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Oakly Enterprises, LLC v. NPI, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Akiak Native Community v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Alaskan Crude Corporation v. State, Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API