Legal Opinion

State v. Valencia

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 13, 2009No. Nos. 36029-2-II; 36115-9-IIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.

¶1 A jury convicted Isidro Sanchez Valencia and Eduardo Chavez Sanchez of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver — marijuana, and conspiracy to commit possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver — marijuana. Sanchez Valencia and Sanchez appeal, claiming that there was insufficient evidence to support their convictions. They also assert that the trial court erred by imposing a community custody condition prohibiting them from possessing drug paraphernalia because, they claim, the community custody condition is unconstitutionally vague. Because the evidence…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. DelmarterWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1990

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. ValenciaWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. ValenciaWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. PadillaWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State Of Washington v. Andres Ramirez MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. State Of Washington v. Jonathan Perez DuenasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API