State v. Valencia
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.
¶1 A jury convicted Isidro Sanchez Valencia and Eduardo Chavez Sanchez of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver — marijuana, and conspiracy to commit possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver — marijuana. Sanchez Valencia and Sanchez appeal, claiming that there was insufficient evidence to support their convictions. They also assert that the trial court erred by imposing a community custody condition prohibiting them from possessing drug paraphernalia because, they claim, the community custody condition is unconstitutionally vague. Because the evidence…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited38 opinions
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. DelmarterWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. ValenciaWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ValenciaWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. PadillaWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- State Of Washington v. Andres Ramirez MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Jonathan Perez DuenasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.