Legal Opinion

United States v. Bame

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 28, 2011No. Civ. 11-62 (RHK/JJK)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This action arises out of the IRS’s erroneous refund of nearly $600,000 to Fred H. Bame in 2005, a portion of which was transferred to Bame’s wife, Defendant JoAnna Bame, and two of her companies, Defendants I Am Home, I nc. (“I Am Home”) and Hook ’n Horn Ltd. (“Hook ’n Horn”). 1 The Government commenced the instant action to recover these transfers, and Defendants now move to dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny their Motion. 2

BACKGROUND

Fred filed for bankruptcy in 1999. (Compl. ¶ 9.) During…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Hamilton v. PalmCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  5. Commercial Property Investments, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Quality Inns International, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Petters Company, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
  2. In re Petters Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API