Cokeley v. Endell
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
Dickie Cokeley appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We reverse and remand.
*332Cokeley filed a pro se section 1983 complaint alleging that various Arkansas Department of Correction officials violated Ms rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. Specifically, Cokeley claimed he became a pretrial detainee when his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition was granted on December 20, 1991. See Cokeley v. Lockhart, 951 F.2d 916, 917 (8th Cir.1991) (writ granted subject to state’s right to retry within a reasonable time), cert. denied, — U.S. —,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Martinez v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Robert E. Williams v. Frank X. Hopkins, Individually and in His Capacity as Warden of the Nebraska State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Billy Joe Armento-Bey v. Charley HarperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Beckett v. Unknown Police OfficerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2019
- Billy Joe Armento-Bey v. Charley HarperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Booker v. Anamosa State PenitentiaryDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2023
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.