Legal Opinion

Cokeley v. Endell

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 16, 1994No. 93-2821PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAGILL, Circuit Judge.

Dickie Cokeley appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We reverse and remand.

*332Cokeley filed a pro se section 1983 complaint alleging that various Arkansas Department of Correction officials violated Ms rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. Specifically, Cokeley claimed he became a pretrial detainee when his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition was granted on December 20, 1991. See Cokeley v. Lockhart, 951 F.2d 916, 917 (8th Cir.1991) (writ granted subject to state’s right to retry within a reasonable time), cert. denied, — U.S. —,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Martinez v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Robert E. Williams v. Frank X. Hopkins, Individually and in His Capacity as Warden of the Nebraska State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. Billy Joe Armento-Bey v. Charley HarperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  3. Beckett v. Unknown Police OfficerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2019
  4. Billy Joe Armento-Bey v. Charley HarperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  5. Booker v. Anamosa State PenitentiaryDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2023

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API