Legal Opinion
Billy Joe Armento-Bey v. Charley Harper
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 19, 1996No. 94-4058Published
1Opinion of the Court
68 F.3d 215
Billy Joe ARMENTO-BEY, Appellant,
v.
Charley HARPER, Appellee.
No. 94-4058.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted June 28, 1995.
Decided Oct. 10, 1995.
Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied Jan.
19, 1996.*
Billy Joe Armento-Bey, pro se.
Appellee was never served.
Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
2Per curiam
1
Iowa inmate Billy Joe Armento-Bey appeals the district court's dismissal as frivolous of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. We reverse.
2
Armento-Bey filed this pro se complaint alleging that he was denied the right to present certain…
Also in this document: Dissent · Bowman; Dissent · Bowman.
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Offet v. SolemCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Cokeley v. EndellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.