Legal Opinion
People v. Failla
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 30, 2006No. E038122PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHLI, J.
In 1989, defendant entered into a plea agreement in which he pleaded guilty to burglary (Pen. Code, § 459) 1 and sexual penetration by foreign object (§ 289) in Los Angeles County. In 1994, he was paroled and moved to San Bernardino County. As part of his plea agreement, defendant was required to register as a sex offender. (§ 290.) Subsequently, defendant filed a certificate of rehabilitation (§§ 4852.01, 4852.06), which would allow him to seek a gubernatorial pardon of his offenses and, hence, relieve him of his obligation to register as a sex offender. Following a hearing,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Los Angeles County Department of Adoptions v. Robert E.California Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. FloresCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. ZeiglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Gee v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Hudson v. Superior Court of Riverside CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Gee v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2016
- Gee v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.