Legal Opinion

McLeod v. Travelers Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1911No. 2501PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action upon policy of insurance; from city court of Atlanta— Judge Calhoun. December 16, 1909.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

1. The exceptions to the award of a nonsuit, and to the refusal of the judge to admit certain evidence which the plaintiff offered, while separately presented, really go to the same point, and as we see it, the decision of the case is controlled by the ruling of the Supreme Court in Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Gate City National Bank, 97 Ga. 634 (25 S. E. 392, 33 L. R. A. 821, 54 Am. St. R. 440). The insurance policy sued on in the present ease provides: “"Written notice as early as may be reasonably possible must be given to the company at Hartford, Connecticut, of the commencement of any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Gate City National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. AzarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Frye v. Continental Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  3. Metcalf v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Neese v. Milwaukee Mechanics' InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  5. Federal Life Insurance v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API