Legal Opinion

Frye v. Continental Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 29, 1931No. 21277PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) It appears that the policy sued on in this case contemplated two communications by the assured touching the subject-matter of the insurance, one being a “written notice of injury on which claim may be based,” and the other being “written proof covering the occurrence, character and extent of the loss for which claim is made,” otherwise referred to as “proof of loss.” Woodall v. Fidelity & Casualty Co., 131 Ga. 517 (62 S. E. 808); Great American Co-Op. Fire Asso. v. Jenkins, 11 Ga. App. 784, 786 (76 S. E. 159); Penn Mutual Ins. Co. v. Milton, 33 Ga. App.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Southern Fire Insurance v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Harp v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Great American Co-Operative Fire Ass'n v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  4. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Gate City National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  5. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. MiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sentinel Fire Insurance v. McRobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Godley v. North River InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Guardian Life Insurance v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Industrial Life & Health Insurance v. WinnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  5. Twin City Fire Insurance v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API