Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Lindsey

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 14, 1983No. 82SA536PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEIGHBORS, Justice.

This is an interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s order “suppressing” statements made by the defendant to a polygraph examiner during and after a polygraph examination. We dismiss the appeal.

The defendant is charged in an information filed in the district court for El Paso County with two counts of sexual assault on a child. 1 The defendant filed a motion to suppress all statements made by him to the police about the crimes charged. The record establishes the following facts and trial court action relating to the motion to suppress:

On April 23, 1982, Detective Robert B.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wyrick v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. People v. DaileySupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. People v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. People v. FidlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  5. People v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. FishSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. People v. BowersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. People v. BraunthalSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  5. People v. CowartSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API