Legal Opinion
Lazarow, Rettig & Sundel v. Castle Capital Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 27, 1980PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Wachtler, J.
The question on this appeal is whether section 94 of title 12 of the United States Code, which permits actions and proceedings to be brought against national banks only in courts of the county or district in which they are located, mandates dis*511missal of a third-party action against such a bank where it is brought in a jurisdiction other than specified by the statute.
Lazarow, Rettig & Sundel (Lazarow) is a New York City law firm. Through Castle Capital Corp. (Castle) as broker Lazarow purchased an interest in a limited partnership organized around an oil and gas…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Casey v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Odette v. Shearson, Hammill & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- George Cohen Agency, Inc. v. Donald S. Perlman Agency, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Roman v. Sunshine Ranchettes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- R. E. Linder Steel Erection Co. v. Alumisteel Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1980
- George Hyman Construction Co. v. Precision Walls, Inc. of RaleighAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re the Estate of JohnsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.