Legal Opinion

Wagner v. City of Inglewood

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1921No. Civ. No. 3588PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Plaintiffs, alleging themselves to he property owners within certain territory proposed to be annexed by the municipality of Inglewood, brought this action to secure judgment declaring proceedings theretofore taken on the part of the municipality in the direction of effecting such annexation void, and to secure a decree enjoining said city from holding an election to decide the question of annexation. Demurrer to the complaint was overruled and answer was filed. The cause went to trial, judgment being rendered against the plaintiffs. From that judgment this appeal has been taken.

It is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Rogers v. CadyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Central Irrigation District v. De LappeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Waterman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Kimball v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. South Shore Land Co. v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Town of Greenfield v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API