Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Alderman

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 13, 1943No. Civil Action 567PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HINCKS, District Judge.

This is a civil action instituted by the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division by an application that the respondents be adjudged guilty of contempt of court and that they be punished and sentenced therefor.

The facts, which were undisputed, are as follows: On March 13, 1941, on a complaint by the Administrator a consent decree was entered by this court which included, inter alia, an order requiring the defendants therein (the respondents here) to pay to all their employees employed since October 24, 1938, amounts equal to the difference between the amounts…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Howat v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Fleming v. Warshawsky & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  5. Securities and Exchange Commission v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. McComb v. Frank Scerbo & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  3. Walling v. O'GRADYCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  4. United States v. P. & W. COAT CO.District Court, E.D. New York · 1943
  5. McComb v. Frank Scerbo & Sons, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API