Legal Opinion
Cadnetix Corp. v. City of Boulder
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided February 28, 1991No. 89CA0168PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge METZGER.
Plaintiff, Cadnetix Corporation, appeals the district court judgment dismissing its C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) complaint as untimely. We affirm.
Although the record is limited, the facts are not in dispute. On June 16, 1987, the city of Boulder issued a Notice of Final Assessment of Sales Tax Due to Cadnetix, which manufactures computer work stations for resale. Cadnetix appealed that determination pursuant to the provisions of the Boulder Revised Code and, on December 8, 1987, a hearing was conducted.
By letter, dated September 6, 1988, to Cadnetix’s comptroller, the appeal was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tri-State Generation & Transmission Co. v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Norby v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Poor v. DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR ARAPAHOE COUNTYSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Lutheran Hospital & Homes Society v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- Gold Star Sausage Co. v. KempfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Carney v. Civil Service CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Baker v. City of DaconoColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Wallin v. CosnerColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Crawford v. State, Department of CorrectionsColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- 3 BAR J HOMEOWNERS ASS'S v. McMurryColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.