Mitchell v. Dixon
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
LOONEY, Justice.
This is a mandamus suit. E. B. Dixon, E. R. Dowlen and E. L. Vickery, relators, sought a writ of mandamus to compel the City of McKinney and its governing body, respondents herein, to appoint a board for the examination of plumbers, in obedience to the mandatory provisions of Articles 1076-1081, R.C.S., and/or of an ordinance of said City, adopted on August 17, 1937. Respondents’ demurrers to relators’ petition having been overruled, the cause was submitted on the pleadings and agreed facts, resulting in a decree commanding respondents to appoint a board for the examination of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Robinson v. City of GalvestonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Parrish v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Caven v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 1907
- Trewitt v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Marr v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mitchell v. DixonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1943
- Mitchell v. DixonTexas Supreme Court · 1943