Legal Opinion

Marr v. Reynolds

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 2, 1941No. 2138PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FUNDERBURK, Justice.

S. F. Reynolds and R. H. Williams brought this suit — a mandamus proceeding —against the City of Lamesa and its Mayor and City Commissioners, to require the defendants “to pass, adopt and enact an ordinance” creating or re-creating a theretofore created and later (allegedly) abolished Examining and Supervising Board of Plumbers; and “to pass and enact” other ordinances with other provisions and relating to other connected subjects. There was also the usual prayer for general and special relief. From the allegations of the plaintiffs’ petition, it appears that on July 1,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. StrumbergTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Sansom v. MercerTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Brown v. RuseTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Robinson v. City of GalvestonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Doeppenschmidt v. City of New BraunfelsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crouch v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. Shirley v. DalbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. City of Houston v. FreedmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. VittMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Mitchell v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API