Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Dixon
Texas Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 1943No. 7999PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Judge Harvey
delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.
This is a suit for mandamus, brought in the district court of Collins County by E. B. Dixon, E. R. Dowlin and E. L. Vick*521ery, as plaintiffs, against W. B. Mitchell, Mayor, and the other members of the governing body of the City of McKinney, as defendants, to compel them to appoint the constituent members of a board for the examination of plumbers, in accordance with the requirements of Article 1078 of the Revised Statutes of 1925. The case was tried, and the trial court entered judgment granting the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- W.D. Yett, Mayor v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Caven v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 1907
- Mitchell v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hunt v. BassTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Terrazas v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- A & W INDUSTRIES, INC. v. DayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- United Oil & Minerals, Inc. v. Costilla Energy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
- United States v. Pennsylvania Industrial Chemical Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.