Legal Opinion

Stehouwer v. Hennessey

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 11, 1994No. C-92-4602-VRW, C-93-0405-VRWPublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER REGARDING PAYMENT OF PARTIAL FILING FEE

WALKER, District Judge.

On May 25,1993, the court issued an order in each of the above-captioned civil rights eases requiring plaintiffs to pay a partial filing fee or, in the alternative, to show cause why partial payment should not be required. On July 16, 1993, plaintiffs’ counsel made a special appearance before the court, solely for the purpose of challenging the partial fee requirement. In plaintiffs’ response to the order to show cause, they argued that a partial filing fee is unauthorized and, in any case, is inappropriate in their…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Flint v. HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
  5. Robert Lumbert v. Illinois Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Samonte v. FrankDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2007
  2. (PC) Cross v. NewsomDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. (PC) Garland v. CDCRDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  4. (PC) Garland v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. (PC) Kendrid v. OguntuaseDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API