Legal Opinion

Flint v. Haynes

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 19, 1981No. Nos. 78-6354, 78-6378, 79-6802PublishedCited by 167 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

K. K. HALL, Circuit Judge:

This is a consolidated appeal from three separate inmate civil rights actions brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in which judgment was entered for the defendants and costs were assessed against the plaintiffs. The only issue presented for review is whether the district court may assess costs against civil rights litigants who have been granted leave to proceed in forma pauper-is.1 We find that 28 U.S.C. § 1915 authorizes the assessment of costs; accordingly, we affirm the judgments below.

In Marks v. Calendine, the plaintiff brought suit against two correctional…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Walter Gordon v. William D. Leeke, Commissioner Joe Martin, Warden, Wayne Stephen Young v. George H. Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  5. Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by167 opinions

  1. Lee Hampton v. Ron HobbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  2. Judson Warren White v. C.M. White, Warden A v. Dodrill, Commissioner of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  3. Roller v. GunnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  4. In Re John Rodgers BurnleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  5. Herbert F. McGill v. Gordon H. Faulkner, Cloid L. Shuler, Jack R. DuckworthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API