Legal Opinion

(PC) Kendrid v. Oguntuase

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 31, 2023No. 2:21-cv-01558Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FORREST KENDRID, Case No. 2:21-cv-01558-WBS-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 13 v. REVOKE PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS BE GRANTED IN 14 E. OGUNTUASE, PART 15 Defendant. ECF No. 15 16 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS 17 18 Plaintiff Forrest Kendrid, a civil detainee at California Medical Facility in Vacaville, 19 brings this case pro se, alleging that defendant violated his rights under the Fourteenth 20 Amendment by exhibiting deliberate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Maria Escobedo v. Apple American GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Olivares v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Stehouwer v. HennesseyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API