Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Melville Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1914PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Harding, J., at December Term, 1913, of Gastoot.

1Opinion of the CourtCiARK, C. J.

The plaintiff, a boy of 14, was employed as a “doffer” in the cotton mill at Gherryville, N. 0. At night, on 8 May,. 1913, while engaged in doffing, he stooped over to pick up empty bobbins, whereupon Tom Carpenter, a youth of 15 or 16 years-of age and a coemployee in the same mill, slipped up behind him, as he was in a stooped position, and, placing the nozzle of a rubber hose carrying compressed air at a pressure of 120 pounds to the square inch near the rectum of the plaintiff, pressed the valve on the end of the nozzle and thus released the compressed air, which entered his rectum with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Drum v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Leathers v. Blackwell Durham Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Martin v. Highland Park Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  4. Hudson v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Creech v. Cotton Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Barnett v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Baber v. . HanieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Ferguson Ex Rel. Ferguson v. Rex Spinning Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Fisher v. BurrellOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Payne v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API