Legal Opinion

Baber v. . Hanie

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 26, 1913PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to recover money, and is based upon the (589) following facts:

The Forest Hill Realty Company conveyed to S. M. Hanie a lot in the city of Charlotte, and S. M. Hanie gave to Forest Hill Realty Company his notes for the purchase money of said lot and secured the same by deed of trust to James L. DeLaney. The Forest Hill Realty Company assigned said notes to J. J. Harrill, who, in turn, transferred the same to the plaintiff. S. M. Hanie executed a second deed of trust to A. P. Rucker to secure an indebtedness to J. W. Lewis Co., and the trustee in the first deed of trust and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Keller v. AshfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. HanfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Knight v. . HoughtallingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  5. Voorhees v. Porter.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Messer v. Laurel Hill AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Kenyon Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Somers v. AvantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API