Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Mills

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 23, 1914PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Harding, J., at July Term, 1914, of CLEVELAND. This is an action to recover damages for personal injury caused by the explosion of a dynamite cap. The material parts of the evidence are stated in the opinion. The defendant moved to dismiss the action because of the pendency of another action for the same cause in Eutherford County, in which a judgment of nonsuit had been entered. The motion was overruled, and the defendant excepted.

Read the full summary

Appeal by defendant from Harding, J., at July Term, 1914, of CLEVELAND. This is an action to recover damages for personal injury caused by the explosion of a dynamite cap. The material parts of the evidence are stated in the opinion. The defendant moved to dismiss the action because of the pendency of another action for the same cause in Eutherford County, in which a judgment of nonsuit had been entered. The motion was overruled, and the defendant excepted. There was also a motion for judgment of nonsuit, which was overruled, and defendant excepted. His Honor charged the jury, among other…

1Opinion of the CourtAlleN, J.

"We will consider together the motion for judgment of non-suit and the exceptions to the instructions to the jury, as both involve the contentions of the defendant that there is no evidence (1) that the dynamite caps were left on the ground by its employees, (2) that the place where the caps were found is a public place, (3) that the place or caps were likely to attract children; and that if there is evidence of these facts, they and the other circumstances relied on by the plaintiff were not sufficient to carry the case to the jury.

We will first reproduce parts of the evidence introduced by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Powers v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Mattson v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Briscoe v. Henderson Lighting & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Brittingham v. . StadiemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. Akin v. Bradley Engineering & Machinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Luttrell v. . Mineral Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Kennedy v. Independent Quarry & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  3. Campbell v. . LaundrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Diehl Ex Rel. Diehl v. A. P. Green Fire Brick Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  5. Stephens v. Blackwood Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API