Rohlman v. Hawkeye Security Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
1DissentReilly, P.J.
I respectfully dissent because I do not believe the concept of stare decisis binds this Court to follow decisions that are based on policy considerations that no longer exist.
In Nickerson v Citizens Mutual Ins Co, 393 Mich 324; 224 NW2d 896 (1975), a case involving a contract of insurance before no-fault, the plaintiff would only be an "assured” covered for injuries caused by an uninsured motorist if the plaintiff was "occupying the insured automobile.” In Nickerson, the term "occupying” was explicitly defined *551in the insurance policy as "in or upon or entering into or alighting from.” Our…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mathis v. Interstate Motor Freight SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Nickerson v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Royal Globe Insurance v. Frankenmuth Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Kalin v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Ottenwess v. Hawkeye Security InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.