Legal Opinion

Dantzer v. Indianapolis Union Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1894No. 16,533PublishedCited by 46 opinions

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

Formerly the appellees’ station for the reception and discharge of passengers for all of the rail*605ways entering the city of Indianapolis was bounded on the north by Louisiana street, on the east by Meridian street, on the south by McNabb street and on the west by Illinois street. McNabb street extended but to the. intersections of Meridian and Illinois streets. One square south of McNabb street, and parallel with that street, was and is South street, extending east and west and connecting with numerous streets of said city, running north and south. Between McNabb and South streets, about…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Coster v. Mayor, Aldermen & CommonaltyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. City of Chicago v. Union Building Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  4. City of Indianapolis v. KingsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Cummins v. City of SeymourIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. ENSLEYIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Hyde v. M., D. & P. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. NoftsgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Powell v. Houston & Texas Central RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Newton v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API