McNamara v. Jose
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Geobge Meade Emoby, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fullerton, J.
— The respondent brought this action against the appellant and one Thomas Carstens to recover upon, a promissory note of which the following is a copy:
“$1,000. Seattle, Wash., Dec. 28th, 1899.
On or before July 1, 1900, after date, (without grace) I promise to pay to the order of J ames Daly, one thousand dollars, for value received, payable only in United States gold coin.
Payable at Cape Home.
Jose & Cabstens,
Per Alfred Jose.”
He alleged in his complaint that he purchased the note from the James Daly named therein as payee, prior to its…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Murray v. LardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
3Cited by13 opinions
- Scandinavian American Bank v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Interstate Bankers Corp. v. KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. LimprightWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Pacific States Automotive Finance Corp. v. AddisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
- Smith v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.