Legal Opinion

McNamara v. Jose

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1902No. 3961PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Geobge Meade Emoby, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fullerton, J.

— The respondent brought this action against the appellant and one Thomas Carstens to recover upon, a promissory note of which the following is a copy:

“$1,000. Seattle, Wash., Dec. 28th, 1899.

On or before July 1, 1900, after date, (without grace) I promise to pay to the order of J ames Daly, one thousand dollars, for value received, payable only in United States gold coin.

Payable at Cape Home.

Jose & Cabstens,

Per Alfred Jose.”

He alleged in his complaint that he purchased the note from the James Daly named therein as payee, prior to its…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murray v. LardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Scandinavian American Bank v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Interstate Bankers Corp. v. KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. LimprightWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Pacific States Automotive Finance Corp. v. AddisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Smith v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API