Legal Opinion

United States Plywood Corp. v. Alexander

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1946PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

For convenience we have referred to the defendant Alexander as “the defendant.” The other parties named as defendants are not involved in the appeal.

By his two assignments of error, the defendant raises a single question. He contends: “The court erred in not treating the timber known as the Johnson-Farley as real property and subject to the right of redemption or decreeing a strict foreclosure and giving the appellant the right to pay respondent the amount due it within a reasonable time, or providing that the timber be sold and making provision for the equitable application of the proceeds…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. McKinstryOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Higgs v. McDuffieOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Marquardt v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Priddy & Chambers v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. Sandy Holding Co. v. FerroOregon Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Paullus v. YARBROUGH ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Emco Investment, Inc. v. VadenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Emco Investment, Inc. v. VadenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API